Cavis v. Beckford

62 N.H. 229

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

As between the mortgagor and mortgagee of the mill, the boiler and looms were fixtures. Mather v. Fraser, 2 K. & J. 536; Walmsley v. Milne, 7 C. B. (N. S.) 115, 132; Climie v. Wood, L. R. 3 Ex. 257; Winslow v. Ins. Co., 4 Met. 306; Richardson v. Copeland, 6 Gray 536; McConnell v. Blood, 123 Mass. 47; Southbridge Bank v. Exeter Works, 127 Mass. 542; Voorhees v. McGinnis, 48 N. Y. 278, 286; Tifft v. Horton, 53 N. Y. 380; Quinby v. Manhattan Co., 24 N. J. Eq. 260; Merritt v. Judd, 14 Cal. 59; Frankland v. Moulton, 5 Wis. 1; Parsons v. Copeland, 38 Me. 537; Symonds v. Harris, 51 Me. 14; Lapham v. Norton, 71 Me. 83, 85; Walker v. Sherman, 20 Wend. 636; Payne v. Bank, 29 Conn. 415; Harlan v. Harlan, 15 Pa. St. 507; Green v. Phillips, 26 Grat. 752; Latham v. Blakely, 70 N. C. 368; Deal v. Palmer, 72 N. C. 582; Boyd v. Shorrock, L. R. 5 Eq. 72; Longbottom v. Berry, L. R. 5 Q B. 123; Despatch Line v. Bellamy M. Co., 12 N. H. 205, 232; Baker v. Davis, 19 N. H. 325, 334; Lathrop v. Blake, 23 N. H. 46, 64; Tuttle v. Robinson, 33 N. H. 104, 119; Wadleigh v. Janvrin, 41 N. H. 503; Burnside v. Twitched, 43 N. H. 390, 393; Cochran v. Flint, 57 N. H. 514; Kent v. Brown, 59 N. H. 236.

Judgment for the defendant.

Allen and Smith, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.