Cavis v. Beckford

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Cavis v. Beckford

62 N.H. 229

DecidedJune 5, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 62 N.H. 229 (Cavis v. Beckford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cavis v. Beckford, 62 N.H. 229 (N.H. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Doe, C. J.

As between the mortgagor and mortgagee of the mill, the boiler and looms were fixtures. Mather v. Fraser, 2 K. & J. 536; Walmsley v. Milne, 7 C. B. (N. S.) 115, 132; Climie v. Wood, L. R. 3 Ex. 257; Winslow v. Ins. Co., 4 Met. 306; Richardson v. Copeland, 6 Gray 536; McConnell v. Blood, 123 Mass. 47; Southbridge Bank v. Exeter Works, 127 Mass. 542; Voorhees v. McGinnis, 48 N. Y. 278, 286; Tifft v. Horton, 53 N. Y. 380; Quinby v. Manhattan Co., 24 N. J. Eq. 260; Merritt v. Judd, 14 Cal. 59; Frankland v. Moulton, 5 Wis. 1; Parsons v. Copeland, 38 Me. 537; Symonds v. Harris, 51 Me. 14; Lapham v. Norton, 71 Me. 83, 85; Walker v. Sherman, 20 Wend. 636; Payne v. Bank, 29 Conn. 415; Harlan v. Harlan, 15 Pa. St. 507; Green v. Phillips, 26 Grat. 752; Latham v. Blakely, 70 N. C. 368; Deal v. Palmer, 72 N. C. 582; Boyd v. Shorrock, L. R. 5 Eq. 72; Longbottom v. Berry, L. R. 5 Q B. 123; Despatch Line v. Bellamy M. Co., 12 N. H. 205, 232; Baker v. Davis, 19 N. H. 325, 334; Lathrop v. Blake, 23 N. H. 46, 64; Tuttle v. Robinson, 33 N. H. 104, 119; Wadleigh v. Janvrin, 41 N. H. 503; Burnside v. Twitched, 43 N. H. 390, 393; Cochran v. Flint, 57 N. H. 514; Kent v. Brown, 59 N. H. 236.

Judgment for the defendant.

Allen and Smith, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Doe, C. J.

As between the mortgagor and mortgagee of the mill, the boiler and looms were fixtures. Mather v. Fraser, 2 K. & J. 536; Walmsley v. Milne, 7 C. B. (N. S.) 115, 132; Climie v. Wood, L. R. 3 Ex. 257; Winslow v. Ins. Co., 4 Met. 306; Richardson v. Copeland, 6 Gray 536; McConnell v. Blood, 123 Mass. 47; Southbridge Bank v. Exeter Works, 127 Mass. 542; Voorhees v. McGinnis, 48 N. Y. 278, 286; Tifft v. Horton, 53 N. Y. 380; Quinby v. Manhattan Co., 24 N. J. Eq. 260; Merritt v. Judd, 14 Cal. 59; Frankland v. Moulton, 5 Wis. 1; Parsons v. Copeland, 38 Me. 537; Symonds v. Harris, 51 Me. 14; Lapham v. Norton, 71 Me. 83, 85; Walker v. Sherman, 20 Wend. 636; Payne v. Bank, 29 Conn. 415; Harlan v. Harlan, 15 Pa. St. 507; Green v. Phillips, 26 Grat. 752; Latham v. Blakely, 70 N. C. 368; Deal v. Palmer, 72 N. C. 582; Boyd v. Shorrock, L. R. 5 Eq. 72; Longbottom v. Berry, L. R. 5 Q B. 123; Despatch Line v. Bellamy M. Co., 12 N. H. 205, 232; Baker v. Davis, 19 N. H. 325, 334; Lathrop v. Blake, 23 N. H. 46, 64; Tuttle v. Robinson, 33 N. H. 104, 119; Wadleigh v. Janvrin, 41 N. H. 503; Burnside v. Twitched, 43 N. H. 390, 393; Cochran v. Flint, 57 N. H. 514; Kent v. Brown, 59 N. H. 236.

Judgment for the defendant.

Allen and Smith, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 N.H. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavis-v-beckford-nh-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack