Caviness v. Administrative Office of the Courts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Caviness v. Administrative Office of the Courts

295 S.E.2d 469, 306 N.C. 738, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1558

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedOctober 5, 1982

DocketNo. 254A82

StatusPublished

This text of 295 S.E.2d 469 (Caviness v. Administrative Office of the Courts) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caviness v. Administrative Office of the Courts, 295 S.E.2d 469, 306 N.C. 738, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1558 (N.C. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The facts of this case are adequately stated in the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the rationale in Judge Hedrick’s dissenting opinion is an accurate statement of the law as it applies to this case. We adopt the dissenting opinion, and the opinion of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions that it enter an order affirming the order of the Industrial Commission.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The facts of this case are adequately stated in the majority opinion of the Court of Appeals. We conclude that the rationale in Judge Hedrick’s dissenting opinion is an accurate statement of the law as it applies to this case. We adopt the dissenting opinion, and the opinion of the Court of Appeals is reversed and this case is remanded to the Court of Appeals with directions that it enter an order affirming the order of the Industrial Commission.

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

295 S.E.2d 469, 306 N.C. 738, 1982 N.C. LEXIS 1558, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caviness-v-administrative-office-of-the-courts-nc-1982.