Cavieres Gomez v. Chestnut
This text of Cavieres Gomez v. Chestnut (Cavieres Gomez v. Chestnut) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5 NICOLAS ESTEBAN CAVIERES Case No. 2:25-cv-00975-GMN-BNW GOMEZ, 6 Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO 7 PROCEED IN DISTRICT COURT v. WITHOUT PREPAYING FEES OR 8 COSTS; SCREENING PETITION; CHRISTOPHER CHESTNUT, et al., GRANTING MOTION FOR 9 APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL; AND Respondents. SERVING PETITION 10
11 12 This is a habeas corpus action brought under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 by Nicolas 13 Esteban Cavieres Gomez, who, according to his petition, is incarcerated at the Nevada 14 Southern Detention Center. On June 2, 2025, Gomez filed an Application to Proceed in 15 District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (ECF No. 1), a Petition for Writ of 16 Habeas Corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (ECF No. 1-1), and a Motion for Appointment 17 of Counsel (ECF No. 1-2). 18 Based on the information in the Application to Proceed in District Court Without 19 Prepaying Fees or Costs (ECF No. 1), the Court determines that Gomez is unable to 20 pay the filing fee for this action and that he qualifies to proceed in forma pauperis. The 21 Court will grant Gomez’s application. 22 The Court has examined Gomez’s habeas petition under Rule 4 of the Rules 23 Governing Section 2254 Cases. See Rule 1(b), Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases 24 (district court may “apply any or all of these rules” to any habeas petition). The Court 25 determines that Gomez’s petition merits service. 26 Prisoners applying for habeas corpus relief are not entitled to appointed counsel 27 unless the circumstances indicate that appointed counsel is necessary to prevent due 1 v. Field, 431 F.2d 638, 640 (9th Cir. 1970) (per curiam)). The court may, however, 2 appoint counsel at any stage of the proceedings if the interests of justice so require. 3 See 18 U.S.C. § 3006A; see also Rule 8(c), Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; Chaney, 4 801 F.2d at 1196. Gomez’s filings indicate that this action may be complex and that he 5 may not be able to litigate this action pro se. The Court finds that appointment of 6 counsel is in the interests of justice. The Court will grant Gomez’s motion for 7 appointment of counsel (ECF No. 1-2). 8 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Petitioner’s Application to Proceed in District 9 Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED. Petitioner is granted 10 leave of court to proceed in forma pauperis. Petitioner will not be required to pay the 11 filing fee for this action. 12 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is kindly directed to 13 separately file the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1) and the Motion for 14 Appointment of Counsel (ECF No. 1-2), 15 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Petitioner’s Motion for Appointment of Counsel 16 (ECF No. 1-2) is GRANTED. The Federal Public Defender for the District of Nevada 17 (FPD) is appointed to represent Petitioner. If the FPD is unable to represent Petitioner, 18 because of a conflict of interest or for any other reason, alternate counsel will be 19 appointed. In either case, counsel will represent Petitioner in all federal court 20 proceedings relating to this matter, unless allowed to withdraw. 21 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to 22 electronically serve upon the FPD a copy of this order, together with a copy of the 23 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1). 24 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the FPD will have 20 days from the date of 25 entry of this order to file a notice of appearance or to indicate to the Court its inability to 26 represent Petitioner. 27 /// 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is kindly directed to serve 2 || copies of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1) and this order upon 3 || Respondents as follows: 4 1. By serving a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1) and 5 || this order on the United States Attorney for the District of Nevada, by electronic means, 6 || in accordance with Rule 5(b)(2)(E) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. 7 2. By sending a copy of the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1) 8 || and this order by mail to: (1) Kristi Noem, Secretary of the U.S. Department of 9 || Homeland Security, Washington, DC 20528; (2) Pam Biondi, Attorney General, U.S. 10 || Department of Justice, 950 Pennsylvania Ave., NW, Washington, DC, 20530; and 11 || (8) U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, 501 S. Las Vegas Blvd., Ste. 200, 12 || Las Vegas, NV 89101, in accordance with Rule 5(b)(2)(C) of the Federal Rules of Civil 13 || Procedure. 14 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Respondents will have 20 days from 15 || the date of entry of this order to appear in this action. Respondents will not be required 16 || to respond to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 1-1) at this time. 17 18 DATED THIS 4 day of June , 2025. 19 20 21 UNIT STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Cavieres Gomez v. Chestnut, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavieres-gomez-v-chestnut-nvd-2025.