Caves v. Hilbert

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Caves v. Hilbert

1950 OK CR 104, 222 P.2d 169, 92 Okla. Crim. 175, 1950 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 271

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedSeptember 6, 1950

DocketA-11445

StatusPublished

This text of 1950 OK CR 104 (Caves v. Hilbert) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caves v. Hilbert, 1950 OK CR 104, 222 P.2d 169, 92 Okla. Crim. 175, 1950 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 271 (Okla. Ct. App. 1950).

Pincite

Opinion

JONES, P. J.

This is a companion to the case of Hill v. Hilbert, 92 Okla. Cr. 169, 222 P. 2d 166. The facts are detailed at length in the opinion of Hill v. Hilbert and will not be further elaborated.

The cases were consolidated for the purpose of hearing and at the conclusion of the hearing an order was made discharging the petitioner Jewel Caves from im: prisonment, the same as was done Avith the petitioner Benton Hill. The reasoning of the court in disposing of the contention of petitioner in Hill v. Hilbert, supra, apply Avith equal force to the contention raised by Jewel Caves.

The action of the police judge in directing that petitioner be held for tests by the venereal clinic was arbitrary and oppressive under the facts presented to us and she is entitled to her discharge.

It is so ordered.

BRETT and POWELL, JJ.. concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI