Caverly v. Gray

73 Mass. 216
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1856
StatusPublished

This text of 73 Mass. 216 (Caverly v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caverly v. Gray, 73 Mass. 216 (Mass. 1856).

Opinion

Dewey, J.

For the limited purpose for which the original writ in favor of the Merrimack River Lumber Company, and the schedule annexed thereto, were admitted, there is no objection to their admission, unless on the ground of irrelevancy [217]*217They certainly had no tendency to show any title in said com« pany, and were not admitted as evidence on that point.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 Mass. 216, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caverly-v-gray-mass-1856.