Caver v. State

Alabama Court of Appeals

Caver v. State

106 So. 915, 21 Ala. App. 664

Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided January 19, 1926·No. 3 Div. 501.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

The first count of the indictment was nol. prossed. The second count, upon which appellant was put to trial in the court below, charged the unlawful possession of a still, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing or distilling prohibited liquors. He was convicted as charged in the second count and appealed. This appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions. The record has been examined and is regular in all things. No error appearing, let the judgment appealed from stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BRICKEN, P. J.

The first count of the indictment was nol. prossed. The second count, upon which appellant was put to trial in the court below, charged the unlawful possession of a still, to be used for the purpose of manufacturing or distilling prohibited liquors. He was convicted as charged in the second count and appealed. This appeal is upon the record proper. There is no bill of exceptions. The record has been examined and is regular in all things. No error appearing, let the judgment appealed from stand affirmed. Affirmed.

Caver v. State, 106 So. 915, 21 Ala. App. 664 (Ala. Ct. App. 1926).

Pincite

106 So. 915 (Caver v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.