Caveness Produce Co. v. City of Raleigh

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Caveness Produce Co. v. City of Raleigh

126 S.E. 926, 189 N.C. 832, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 415

DecidedMarch 25, 1925

StatusPublished

This text of 126 S.E. 926 (Caveness Produce Co. v. City of Raleigh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caveness Produce Co. v. City of Raleigh, 126 S.E. 926, 189 N.C. 832, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 415 (N.C. 1925).

Pincite

Opinion

Per, Curiam.

It is not necessary to consider the question whether the alleged contract of the defendant was ultra vires, for upon competent evidence and a charge free from error the jury found that no such contract had been made and that the alleged loss had not been caused by the defendant’s negligence.

The exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence are without merit.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per, Curiam.

It is not necessary to consider the question whether the alleged contract of the defendant was ultra vires, for upon competent evidence and a charge free from error the jury found that no such contract had been made and that the alleged loss had not been caused by the defendant’s negligence.

The exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence are without merit.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

126 S.E. 926, 189 N.C. 832, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 415, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caveness-produce-co-v-city-of-raleigh-nc-1925.