Caveness Produce Co. v. City of Raleigh
126 S.E. 926, 189 N.C. 832, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 415
Opinion
It is not necessary to consider the question whether the alleged contract of the defendant was ultra vires, for upon competent evidence and a charge free from error the jury found that no such contract had been made and that the alleged loss had not been caused by the defendant’s negligence.
The exceptions to the admission and exclusion of evidence are without merit.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caveness Produce Co. v. City of Raleigh, 126 S.E. 926, 189 N.C. 832, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 415 (N.C. 1925).
126 S.E. 926 (Caveness Produce Co. v. City of Raleigh) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.