Caveness Produce Co. v. Chandler-Davis Co.
126 S.E. 513, 189 N.C. 829, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 411
Opinion
This case is not unlike many others in our reports, and it seems to have been tried in accordance with the law heretofore declared in a number of decisions. Sterling Mills v. Milling Co., 184 N. C., 461; Bank v. Monroe, 188 N. C., 446; Mangum v. Grain Co., 184 N. C., 181.
The record presents no reversible error, and hence the verdict and judgment will be upheld.
No error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caveness Produce Co. v. Chandler-Davis Co., 126 S.E. 513, 189 N.C. 829, 1925 N.C. LEXIS 411 (N.C. 1925).
126 S.E. 513 (Caveness Produce Co. v. Chandler-Davis Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mangum v. Mutual Grain Co.
114 S.E. 2 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)
First National Bank of Spartanburg v. Monroe
124 S.E. 741 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1924)
Sterling Mills, Inc. v. Saginaw Milling Co.
114 S.E. 756 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1922)