NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 22-MAR-2024 07:53 AM Dkt. 117 SO
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
FREDERICK T. CAVEN, JR., on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CERTIFIED MANAGEMENT, INC., dba ASSOCIA HAWAII, Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10, DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10, DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10, DOE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS 1-10, AND DOE ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 1CC161001778)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Nakasone, JJ.)
Plaintiff-Appellant Frederick T. Caven, Jr. (Caven)
appeals from the Final Judgment entered on December 26, 2018
(Judgment) by the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (Circuit
Court).1 Caven also challenges the following Circuit Court
orders: Order Granting Defendant[-Appellee] Certified
Management, Inc., dba Associa Hawaii
Partial Summary Judgment [(MPSJ)] on Count I of the First Amended
Complaint [(FAC)], filed on February 2, 2018 (Order II); Order
1 The Honorable James H. Ashford presided. NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Granting [Associa's MPSJ] on Count I and Count II of the [FAC] as
to All Claims Related to Form RR105c [(RR105c)] and Statements of
Account [(SOA)], filed on July 19, 2018 (Order IV); and Order
Granting [Associa's MPSJ] on Count I of the [FAC] as to the
Claimed Prohibition Against Charging Fees for Association
Documents Made Available Electronically for Download Through an
Internet Site Filed July 5, 2018, filed on September 20, 2018
(Order V).
Caven raises four points of error on appeal, contending that the Circuit Court erred in finding that: (1) Hawaii Revised
Statutes (HRS) Chapter 514B (Chapter 514B) did not apply to the
certain Poipu Kai Association (PKA) documents Caven purchased
from Associa because they were necessary for Caven to sell his
condominium unit (unit); (2) Chapter 514B only applies to general
association documents and not RR105c or the Regency at Poipu Kai
Association of Apartment Owners (Regency AOAO) SOA; (3) HRS
Chapter 421J (Chapter 421J) only applies to general association
documents and not the PKA SOA; and (4) Associa, as a managing
agent, is not required to provide RR105c and the Regency AOAO SOA
for free under HRS § 514B-154.5(e) (2018).
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs
submitted by the parties, and having given due consideration to
the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we
resolve Caven's points of error as follows:
Caven co-owned a condominium at Poipu Kai Resort
(Resort) and was a member of both the PKA, a planned community
association, and the Regency AOAO, a condominium association
2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
(collectively, Associations). Associa is the managing agent for
both Associations. Caven sold his condominium unit in 2016 and
requested certain documents and an SOA from both Associations to
aid in the closing of the sale of his unit. Associa charged him
fees and, as a result, he filed this law suit.
(1) Caven argues that the Circuit Court erred in
concluding that Chapter 421J exclusively governed Caven's
purchase of the PKA documents and that Chapter 514B did not
apply. Caven submits that because HRS § 514B-154.5 governs requests for information and disclosures related to the resale of
condominium units, it does not conflict with Chapter 421J, and
HRS § 514B-154.5 applies to the PKA documents.
First, as noted above, the PKA and the Regency AOAO are
distinct entities: the PKA is a planned community association;
the Regency AOAO is a condominium association. Planned community
associations are subject to Chapter 421J, and condominium
associations are subject to Chapter 514B. HRS § 421J-1 (2004),
provides plainly, "[t]his chapter shall apply to all planned
community associations. . ."; HRS § 514B-21 (2018) offers that
"[t]his chapter applies to all condominiums created within this
State."
Second, planned community associations and condominium
associations provide different services. Here, the PKA "is
responsible for operating and maintaining common property
throughout the Resort," and the Regency AOAO "is responsible for
operating and maintaining the common elements of the Regency
condominiums." While the Associations' services may overlap,
3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
they are nonetheless distinct: the PKA is concerned with the
entire Resort; the Regency AOAO is concerned with an individual
condominium project.
Third, as stated in Order II, the terms "association"
and "managing agent" used in HRS § 514B-154.5(a) make clear that
those positions and entities refer solely to condominium
projects. "'Association' means the unit owners' association
organized under section 514B-102." HRS § 514B-3 (2018). Only
condominium associations are formed under HRS § 514B-102 (2018), and only Owners may be part of a condominium association. See
Sciotto v. Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Hanalei Bay Resort, No.
19-CV-00433-DKW-WRP, 2019 WL 7373026, *4 (D. Haw. Dec. 31, 2019)
(Order) ("Hawaii statute provides that the members of the AOAO
are 'all the unit owners.'") (citing HRS § 514B-102(b)).
"'Managing agent' means any person retained, as an independent
contractor, for the purpose of managing the operation of the
property." HRS § 514B-3 (emphasis added). "Property" relates
only to those structures or rights "for use in connection with
the condominium." Id. (emphasis added).
Fourth, while Caven notes that under HRS § 514B-
154.5(a)(1) the managing agent shall disclose "[a]ll financial
and other records sufficiently detailed in order to comply with
requests for information and disclosures related to the resale of
units," § 514B-154.5(a) nevertheless limits all disclosures to
condominium-association-specific records.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 22-MAR-2024 07:53 AM Dkt. 117 SO
NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX
IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I
FREDERICK T. CAVEN, JR., on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CERTIFIED MANAGEMENT, INC., dba ASSOCIA HAWAII, Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10, DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10, DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10, DOE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS 1-10, AND DOE ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants
APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 1CC161001778)
SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Nakasone, JJ.)
Plaintiff-Appellant Frederick T. Caven, Jr. (Caven)
appeals from the Final Judgment entered on December 26, 2018
(Judgment) by the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (Circuit
Court).1 Caven also challenges the following Circuit Court
orders: Order Granting Defendant[-Appellee] Certified
Management, Inc., dba Associa Hawaii
Partial Summary Judgment [(MPSJ)] on Count I of the First Amended
Complaint [(FAC)], filed on February 2, 2018 (Order II); Order
1 The Honorable James H. Ashford presided. NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
Granting [Associa's MPSJ] on Count I and Count II of the [FAC] as
to All Claims Related to Form RR105c [(RR105c)] and Statements of
Account [(SOA)], filed on July 19, 2018 (Order IV); and Order
Granting [Associa's MPSJ] on Count I of the [FAC] as to the
Claimed Prohibition Against Charging Fees for Association
Documents Made Available Electronically for Download Through an
Internet Site Filed July 5, 2018, filed on September 20, 2018
(Order V).
Caven raises four points of error on appeal, contending that the Circuit Court erred in finding that: (1) Hawaii Revised
Statutes (HRS) Chapter 514B (Chapter 514B) did not apply to the
certain Poipu Kai Association (PKA) documents Caven purchased
from Associa because they were necessary for Caven to sell his
condominium unit (unit); (2) Chapter 514B only applies to general
association documents and not RR105c or the Regency at Poipu Kai
Association of Apartment Owners (Regency AOAO) SOA; (3) HRS
Chapter 421J (Chapter 421J) only applies to general association
documents and not the PKA SOA; and (4) Associa, as a managing
agent, is not required to provide RR105c and the Regency AOAO SOA
for free under HRS § 514B-154.5(e) (2018).
Upon careful review of the record and the briefs
submitted by the parties, and having given due consideration to
the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we
resolve Caven's points of error as follows:
Caven co-owned a condominium at Poipu Kai Resort
(Resort) and was a member of both the PKA, a planned community
association, and the Regency AOAO, a condominium association
2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
(collectively, Associations). Associa is the managing agent for
both Associations. Caven sold his condominium unit in 2016 and
requested certain documents and an SOA from both Associations to
aid in the closing of the sale of his unit. Associa charged him
fees and, as a result, he filed this law suit.
(1) Caven argues that the Circuit Court erred in
concluding that Chapter 421J exclusively governed Caven's
purchase of the PKA documents and that Chapter 514B did not
apply. Caven submits that because HRS § 514B-154.5 governs requests for information and disclosures related to the resale of
condominium units, it does not conflict with Chapter 421J, and
HRS § 514B-154.5 applies to the PKA documents.
First, as noted above, the PKA and the Regency AOAO are
distinct entities: the PKA is a planned community association;
the Regency AOAO is a condominium association. Planned community
associations are subject to Chapter 421J, and condominium
associations are subject to Chapter 514B. HRS § 421J-1 (2004),
provides plainly, "[t]his chapter shall apply to all planned
community associations. . ."; HRS § 514B-21 (2018) offers that
"[t]his chapter applies to all condominiums created within this
State."
Second, planned community associations and condominium
associations provide different services. Here, the PKA "is
responsible for operating and maintaining common property
throughout the Resort," and the Regency AOAO "is responsible for
operating and maintaining the common elements of the Regency
condominiums." While the Associations' services may overlap,
3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
they are nonetheless distinct: the PKA is concerned with the
entire Resort; the Regency AOAO is concerned with an individual
condominium project.
Third, as stated in Order II, the terms "association"
and "managing agent" used in HRS § 514B-154.5(a) make clear that
those positions and entities refer solely to condominium
projects. "'Association' means the unit owners' association
organized under section 514B-102." HRS § 514B-3 (2018). Only
condominium associations are formed under HRS § 514B-102 (2018), and only Owners may be part of a condominium association. See
Sciotto v. Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Hanalei Bay Resort, No.
19-CV-00433-DKW-WRP, 2019 WL 7373026, *4 (D. Haw. Dec. 31, 2019)
(Order) ("Hawaii statute provides that the members of the AOAO
are 'all the unit owners.'") (citing HRS § 514B-102(b)).
"'Managing agent' means any person retained, as an independent
contractor, for the purpose of managing the operation of the
property." HRS § 514B-3 (emphasis added). "Property" relates
only to those structures or rights "for use in connection with
the condominium." Id. (emphasis added).
Fourth, while Caven notes that under HRS § 514B-
154.5(a)(1) the managing agent shall disclose "[a]ll financial
and other records sufficiently detailed in order to comply with
requests for information and disclosures related to the resale of
units," § 514B-154.5(a) nevertheless limits all disclosures to
condominium-association-specific records. HRS § 514B-154.5(a)
provides that all records "whether maintained, kept, or required
to be provided pursuant to this section or section 514B-152,
4 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
514B-153, or 514B-154," shall be disclosed "by the managing
agent." Under HRS § 514B-154(d) (2018), "[t]he managing agent
shall provide copies of association records maintained pursuant
to this section and sections 514B-152 and 514B-153 to owners."
Further, "maintained pursuant to this section and
sections 514B-152 and 514B-153" follows "association records."
Under the canons of legislative interpretation, laws in pari
materia, or upon the same subject matter, shall be construed with
reference to each other. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Omiya, 142 Hawai
and internal quotation marks omitted). Association records are
those items specified under HRS §§ 514B-152, 514B-153, and
514B-154, which are maintained by the condominium association or
managing agent of the condominium association and relate only to
the condominium association. Those include, inter alia,
"financial statements," and other like records, such as "invoices
of the association . . . kept by the association," "financial and
other records" kept by the association, and governance records
"kept at the managing agent's office." HRS §§ 514B-152,
514B-153(a), and 514B-154(b). Here, the PKA's SOA is not kept by
the Regency AOAO.
In sum, the disclosure obligations of a condominium's
managing agent under Chapter 514B do not extend to the records of
a planned community association. Caven's objection here was to
having to pay for the records of the planned community
association. We conclude that the Circuit Court did not err in
5 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
its Order II in concluding that Chapter 514B did not apply to the
PKA SOA.
(2) Caven argues that the Circuit Court erred in Order
IV in concluding that RR105c and the Regency AOAO SOA do not fall
under the purview of Chapter 514B. Caven's main argument is that
the inclusion of "information" in HRS § 514B-154.5(a)(1),
requiring that managing agents disclose "[a]ll financial and
other records sufficiently detailed in order to comply with
requests for information and disclosures related to the resale of units," indicates that the disclosure obligation is not limited
to pre-existing documents. This argument has merit.
HRS § 514B-152 instructs condominium associations to
"keep financial and other records" to "comply with requests for
information and disclosures related to resale of units," and
offer other financial records necessary for disclosures under HRS
§ 514B-154.5. HRS § 514B-154.5(a) is not limited to what the
condominium association keeps; instead, it provides that items
"whether maintained, kept, or required to be provided pursuant to
this section or section 514B-152 . . . shall be made available
. . . by the managing agent." HRS § 514B-154.5(a) is not limited
to the disclosure of documents but also "records[] and
information." Thus, disclosures are not limited to pre-existing
documents.
An RR105c lists the general common elements of the
condominium, but it is not a document that is generated or
maintained by Associa or the Regency AOAO in the first instance.
It is a form from the Hawaii Realtors Association that is filled
6 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
out by the managing agent with information kept by the managing
agent. Chapter 514B does not specifically require the disclosure
of the common elements of a condominium, although it does require
disclosure of, inter alia, detailed records of receipts and
expenditures affecting the common elements. See HRS § 514B-
154.5(a)(3). However, to sell his Unit, Caven was required to
provide the buyer a completed RR105c, and thus Caven requested an
RR105c from the Regency AOAO. Chapter 514B requires that
condominium associations provide documents, records, and information sufficient "to comply with requests for information
and disclosures related to the resale of units." HRS § 514B-
154.5(a)(1). As the information provided in the RR105c was
required for the resale of Caven's unit, Associa had a duty to
provide it, regardless of whether the Regency AOAO kept or
maintained it in that form so long as Caven agreed to pay "for
the reasonable cost of providing the information." See HRS §
514B-105(d).
An SOA states outstanding charges owed by a unit owner
to the respective condominium association. Here, the Regency
AOAO SOA was required to consummate the sale of Caven's unit. As
noted above, HRS § 514B-154.5(a) does not limit the managing
agent's disclosure requirements to documents kept by the
condominium association, but includes "documents, records, and
information . . . required to be provided," which includes items
necessary "to comply with requests for information and
disclosures related to the resale of units," and the "invoices of
the association." HRS § 514B-154.5(a)(1) and (10). Associa was
7 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
required to provide the Regency AOAO SOA as long as Caven agreed
to pay "for the reasonable cost of providing the information."
See HRS § 514B-105(d). The Circuit Court erred in Order IV in
concluding otherwise.
(3) Caven argues that the Circuit Court erred in
concluding that Chapter 421J only required Associa to provide
association documents on behalf of PKA and not a PKA SOA.
Unlike HRS § 514B-154.5(a)'s mandate to disclose
invoices, "whether maintained, kept, or required to be provided," HRS § 421J-7(c) (Supp. 2022) merely provides that for invoices
"kept by the association," "[c]opies of these documents" must be
disclosed. Thus, HRS § 421J-7(c) mandates the disclosure of
invoices, and not the generation of a PKA SOA. We conclude that
the Circuit Court did not err in its Order IV in concluding that
the PKA SOA was not required to be provided free of charge
pursuant to HRS chapter 421J.
(4) Caven argues that because Associa provided the
Regency AOAO SOA and RR105c electronically for download, pursuant
to HRS § 514B-154.5(e), they should have been provided to him for
free. This argument has merit. HRS § 514B-154.5 provides, in
relevant part: § 514B-154.5 Association documents to be provided. (a) Notwithstanding any other provision in the declaration, bylaws, or house rules, if any, the following documents, records, and information, whether maintained, kept, or required to be provided pursuant to this section or section 514B-152, 514B-153, or 514B-154, shall be made available to any unit owner and the owner's authorized agents by the managing agent, resident manager, board through a board member, or the association's representative[.] . . . . (e) An association may comply with this section or section 514B-152, 514B-153, or 514B-154 by making the
8 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
required documents, records, and information available to unit owners or owners' authorized agents for download through an internet site, at the option of each unit owner or owner's authorized agent and at no cost to the unit owner or owner's authorized agent. (f) Any fee charged to a unit owner or owner's authorized agent to obtain copies of the association's documents, records, and information, whether maintained, kept, or required to be provided pursuant to this section or section 514B-152, 514B-153, or 514B-154, shall be reasonable; provided that a reasonable fee shall include administrative and duplicating costs and shall not exceed $1 per page, or portion thereof, except that the fee for pages exceeding eight and one-half inches by fourteen inches may exceed $1 per page.
The statute provides that a condominium association can
provide required documents by way of a download through an
internet site – free of charge – or a condominium association can
otherwise provide required documents – subject to a reasonable
fee for administrative and duplicating costs. We decline to
adopt the Circuit Court's distinction of whether the managing
agent of the association or the association provided the required
documents by way of a download through an internet site. Under
this statutory scheme, documents provided by way of a download
through an internet site are provided free of charge.
Accordingly, we conclude that the Circuit Court erred in Order V. For these reasons, the Circuit Court's December 26,
2018 Judgment is affirmed in part and vacated in part. Order II
is affirmed, Order IV is affirmed in part and vacated in part,
and V is vacated. This case is remanded to the Circuit Court for
further proceedings consistent with this Summary Disposition
Order.
9 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER
DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, March 22, 2024.
On the briefs: /s/ Katherine G. Leonard Acting Chief Judgment Margery S. Bronster, Robert M. Hatch, /s/ Keith K. Hiraoka Kelly A. Higa, Associate Judge (Bronster Fujichaku Robbins), for Plaintiff-Appellant. /s/ Karen T. Nakasone Associate Judge David M. Louie, Nicholas R. Monlux, (Kobayashi Sugita & Goda, LLP), for Defendant-Appellee.