Caven, Jr. v. Certified Management, Inc.

545 P.3d 575, 154 Haw. 86
CourtHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 22, 2024
DocketCAAP-19-0000047
StatusPublished

This text of 545 P.3d 575 (Caven, Jr. v. Certified Management, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caven, Jr. v. Certified Management, Inc., 545 P.3d 575, 154 Haw. 86 (hawapp 2024).

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Electronically Filed Intermediate Court of Appeals CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX 22-MAR-2024 07:53 AM Dkt. 117 SO

NO. CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

FREDERICK T. CAVEN, JR., on behalf of himself and a class of similarly situated persons, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CERTIFIED MANAGEMENT, INC., dba ASSOCIA HAWAII, Defendant-Appellee, and JOHN DOES 1-10, JANE DOES 1-10, DOE CORPORATIONS 1-10, DOE PARTNERSHIPS 1-10, DOE NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATIONS 1-10, AND DOE ENTITIES 1-10, Defendants

APPEAL FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIRST CIRCUIT (CASE NO. 1CC161001778)

SUMMARY DISPOSITION ORDER (By: Leonard, Acting Chief Judge, Hiraoka and Nakasone, JJ.)

Plaintiff-Appellant Frederick T. Caven, Jr. (Caven)

appeals from the Final Judgment entered on December 26, 2018

(Judgment) by the Circuit Court of the First Circuit (Circuit

Court).1 Caven also challenges the following Circuit Court

orders: Order Granting Defendant[-Appellee] Certified

Management, Inc., dba Associa Hawaii

Partial Summary Judgment [(MPSJ)] on Count I of the First Amended

Complaint [(FAC)], filed on February 2, 2018 (Order II); Order

1 The Honorable James H. Ashford presided. NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

Granting [Associa's MPSJ] on Count I and Count II of the [FAC] as

to All Claims Related to Form RR105c [(RR105c)] and Statements of

Account [(SOA)], filed on July 19, 2018 (Order IV); and Order

Granting [Associa's MPSJ] on Count I of the [FAC] as to the

Claimed Prohibition Against Charging Fees for Association

Documents Made Available Electronically for Download Through an

Internet Site Filed July 5, 2018, filed on September 20, 2018

(Order V).

Caven raises four points of error on appeal, contending that the Circuit Court erred in finding that: (1) Hawaii Revised

Statutes (HRS) Chapter 514B (Chapter 514B) did not apply to the

certain Poipu Kai Association (PKA) documents Caven purchased

from Associa because they were necessary for Caven to sell his

condominium unit (unit); (2) Chapter 514B only applies to general

association documents and not RR105c or the Regency at Poipu Kai

Association of Apartment Owners (Regency AOAO) SOA; (3) HRS

Chapter 421J (Chapter 421J) only applies to general association

documents and not the PKA SOA; and (4) Associa, as a managing

agent, is not required to provide RR105c and the Regency AOAO SOA

for free under HRS § 514B-154.5(e) (2018).

Upon careful review of the record and the briefs

submitted by the parties, and having given due consideration to

the arguments advanced and the issues raised by the parties, we

resolve Caven's points of error as follows:

Caven co-owned a condominium at Poipu Kai Resort

(Resort) and was a member of both the PKA, a planned community

association, and the Regency AOAO, a condominium association

2 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

(collectively, Associations). Associa is the managing agent for

both Associations. Caven sold his condominium unit in 2016 and

requested certain documents and an SOA from both Associations to

aid in the closing of the sale of his unit. Associa charged him

fees and, as a result, he filed this law suit.

(1) Caven argues that the Circuit Court erred in

concluding that Chapter 421J exclusively governed Caven's

purchase of the PKA documents and that Chapter 514B did not

apply. Caven submits that because HRS § 514B-154.5 governs requests for information and disclosures related to the resale of

condominium units, it does not conflict with Chapter 421J, and

HRS § 514B-154.5 applies to the PKA documents.

First, as noted above, the PKA and the Regency AOAO are

distinct entities: the PKA is a planned community association;

the Regency AOAO is a condominium association. Planned community

associations are subject to Chapter 421J, and condominium

associations are subject to Chapter 514B. HRS § 421J-1 (2004),

provides plainly, "[t]his chapter shall apply to all planned

community associations. . ."; HRS § 514B-21 (2018) offers that

"[t]his chapter applies to all condominiums created within this

State."

Second, planned community associations and condominium

associations provide different services. Here, the PKA "is

responsible for operating and maintaining common property

throughout the Resort," and the Regency AOAO "is responsible for

operating and maintaining the common elements of the Regency

condominiums." While the Associations' services may overlap,

3 NOT FOR PUBLICATION IN WEST'S HAWAI#I REPORTS AND PACIFIC REPORTER

they are nonetheless distinct: the PKA is concerned with the

entire Resort; the Regency AOAO is concerned with an individual

condominium project.

Third, as stated in Order II, the terms "association"

and "managing agent" used in HRS § 514B-154.5(a) make clear that

those positions and entities refer solely to condominium

projects. "'Association' means the unit owners' association

organized under section 514B-102." HRS § 514B-3 (2018). Only

condominium associations are formed under HRS § 514B-102 (2018), and only Owners may be part of a condominium association. See

Sciotto v. Ass'n of Apartment Owners of Hanalei Bay Resort, No.

19-CV-00433-DKW-WRP, 2019 WL 7373026, *4 (D. Haw. Dec. 31, 2019)

(Order) ("Hawaii statute provides that the members of the AOAO

are 'all the unit owners.'") (citing HRS § 514B-102(b)).

"'Managing agent' means any person retained, as an independent

contractor, for the purpose of managing the operation of the

property." HRS § 514B-3 (emphasis added). "Property" relates

only to those structures or rights "for use in connection with

the condominium." Id. (emphasis added).

Fourth, while Caven notes that under HRS § 514B-

154.5(a)(1) the managing agent shall disclose "[a]ll financial

and other records sufficiently detailed in order to comply with

requests for information and disclosures related to the resale of

units," § 514B-154.5(a) nevertheless limits all disclosures to

condominium-association-specific records.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Omiya.
420 P.3d 370 (Hawaii Supreme Court, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
545 P.3d 575, 154 Haw. 86, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caven-jr-v-certified-management-inc-hawapp-2024.