Cave v. Cave

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cave v. Cave

146 So. 3d 148, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13743, 2014 WL 4374534

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedSeptember 5, 2014

DocketNo. 5D14-1129

StatusPublished

This text of 146 So. 3d 148 (Cave v. Cave) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cave v. Cave, 146 So. 3d 148, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13743, 2014 WL 4374534 (Fla. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

John Cave appeals the summary denial of his motion to dissolve an injunction for protection previously entered against him. Because Cave’s motion sufficiently alleged that circumstances had changed subsequent to denial of his earlier motions to dissolve, he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing. See Raymonvil v. Lewis, 46 So.3d 189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, LAMBERT, JJ., and HARRIS, C. M., Senior Judge, concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

John Cave appeals the summary denial of his motion to dissolve an injunction for protection previously entered against him. Because Cave’s motion sufficiently alleged that circumstances had changed subsequent to denial of his earlier motions to dissolve, he was entitled to an evidentiary hearing. See Raymonvil v. Lewis, 46 So.3d 189 (Fla. 5th DCA 2010).

REVERSED and REMANDED.

EVANDER, LAMBERT, JJ., and HARRIS, C. M., Senior Judge, concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 So. 3d 148, 2014 Fla. App. LEXIS 13743, 2014 WL 4374534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cave-v-cave-fladistctapp-2014.