Cavanaugh v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Cavanaugh v. State

31 Ind. 229

DecidedMay 15, 1869

StatusPublished

This text of 31 Ind. 229 (Cavanaugh v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cavanaugh v. State, 31 Ind. 229 (Ind. 1869).

Pincite

Opinion

Elliott, G J.

Cavanaugh, the appellant, was tried and convicted on an indictment for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor, and fined five dollars and costs.

The only errors assigned are, that the finding was contrary to law and to the evidence given on the trial.

A new trial was asked for the same reasons, which was overruled; but overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error, and under repeated rulings of this court, the errors assigned do not properly present any question for the decision of this court. The judgment must, therefore, he affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Elliott, G J.

Cavanaugh, the appellant, was tried and convicted on an indictment for selling intoxicating liquor to a minor, and fined five dollars and costs.

The only errors assigned are, that the finding was contrary to law and to the evidence given on the trial.

A new trial was asked for the same reasons, which was overruled; but overruling the motion for a new trial is not assigned for error, and under repeated rulings of this court, the errors assigned do not properly present any question for the decision of this court. The judgment must, therefore, he affirmed.

Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 Ind. 229, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavanaugh-v-state-ind-1869.