Cavanaugh v. Murphy Varnish Co.
35 A.2d 896, 131 N.J.L. 163, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 164
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed, for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Donges in the Supreme Court.
For affirmance — Tub Chancellor, Chibe Justice, Parker, Bobine, Heher, Porter, Dear, Wells, Raeeerty, "Hague, Thompson, Dill, JJ. 12.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cavanaugh v. Murphy Varnish Co., 35 A.2d 896, 131 N.J.L. 163, 1944 N.J. LEXIS 164 (N.J. 1944).
35 A.2d 896 (Cavanaugh v. Murphy Varnish Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibson v. Todd Shipyard Corp.
132 A.2d 337 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1957)
Neylon v. Ford Motor Company
86 A.2d 577 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1952)
Ptak v. General Electric Co.
85 A.2d 214 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Neylon v. Ford Motor Co.
80 A.2d 235 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1951)
Mills v. Monte Christi Corp.
76 A.2d 839 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1950)
Grassgreen v. Ridgeley Sportswear Mfg. Co.
64 A.2d 616 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1949)