Cavanaugh v. Fried

11 Ky. Op. 238, 3 Ky. L. Rptr. 253, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 259
Court of Appeals of Kentucky·Decided September 22, 1881·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge Pryor:'

The objection in this case to a personal judgment against the appellant is that none is asked, and standing in court as a mere garnishee a rule should have been awarded against her to bring the money into court. It is evident from the facts of this record that the appellant is entitled to relief. The personal judgment could not have been rendered for the additional reason that no cause of action is alleged upon which to base it. The appellant should either bring the money into court or produce the property that it may be sold.

Judgment reversed and cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cavanaugh v. Fried, 11 Ky. Op. 238, 3 Ky. L. Rptr. 253, 1881 Ky. LEXIS 259 (Ky. Ct. App. 1881).

11 Ky. Op. 238 (Cavanaugh v. Fried) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Swope v. Central Greyhound Lines
128 S.W.2d 171 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1939)
Sanders & Walker v. Herndon
122 Ky. 760 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1906)