Cavanaugh v. Feldman

240 A.D. 908
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedNovember 15, 1933
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 240 A.D. 908 (Cavanaugh v. Feldman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cavanaugh v. Feldman, 240 A.D. 908 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1933).

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, for error in the refusal to charge the requests at folios 401 and 404; and upon the further ground that the verdict, in our opinion, was inadequate as matter of fact. We deem it proper to say that the verdict of a jury in a death case is to be treated no differently than a verdict in the case of a living person. If a verdict in a death case is plainly inadequate or excessive, it is the duty of the courts to correct it. Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Carswell and Davis, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Pitts v. Columbus McKinnon Corp.
75 A.D.2d 1002 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Kraus v. Ford Motor Co.
55 A.D.2d 851 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1976)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 A.D. 908, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavanaugh-v-feldman-nyappdiv-1933.