Cavanaugh v. Davis

Superior Court of Maine·Decided July 3, 2017·No. CUMcv-17-0113·Unpublished

Opinion

STATE OF MAINE SUPERIOR COURT CUMBERLAND, SS CIVIL ACTION Docket No. PORSC-CV-17-0llS

JOHN CAVANAUGH )

)

Plaintiff ) S\/.\i ~: OF :/,-':J, i ~~ = ) Cu:nbe:-lai'~(.J. :": ~ r.~!::):--~: ·s c;f1;c e

v. )

)

VALERIE DAVIS and ) WICCAGOOD WELLNESS, LLC )

)

Defendants )

ORDER ON PLAINTIFF'S MOTION TO TERMINATE STAY Plaintiff John Cavanaugh has filed a Supplement to Suggestion of Bankruptcy and Motion to Terminate Stay Order As It Applies to Plaintiffs Complaint. The Motion seeks to modify the May 1, 2017 Stay Order to allow Plaintiff to pursue the claim in his Complaint, while maintaining the stay as to Defendant's Counterclaim. Defendant opposes the Motion. The court elects to decide the Motion without hearing.

The question raised by the Motion to Terminate is whether Plaintiff has standing to pursue the claims against Defendant set forth in his Complaint. The weight of authority appears to be that, although a chapter 7 bankruptcy debtor lacks standing to pursue pre-petition claims against third parties, a chapter 13 bankruptcy debtor has concurrent standing with the bankruptcy trustee to pursue claims against third parties. See, e.g., Bennett v. Flagstar Bank, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141066 *4-7, 2011 WL 6152940; Chaput v. Scafidi, 2017 V.I. LEXIS 87 (V.I. Super. Ct., St. Croix Div.); West v. Young, 38 Misc. 3d 1030, 1033-36 (N.Y. Supr., Westch. Cty. 2013).

Because a chapter 13 debtor's standing to pursue claims against third parties is concurrent with that of the trustee, as long as the chapter 13 trustee is not pursuing Plaintiffs claim against Defendant, then the Plaintiff may pursue the claims here. The present record is silent on the trustee's intention regarding the Plaintiff's claims against Defendant, so this court will defer acting on the Motion to Terminate until the trustee's position on pursuing Plaintiff's claims against Defendant is made a matter of record in this case. Either party may make a supplemental filing within 30 days of this order. If no such filing is received, the Motion to Terminate will be dismissed after 30 days.

Pursuant to M.R. Civ. P. 79(a), the Clerk is hereby directed to incorporate this Order by reference in the docket.

Dated July 3, 2017 dtt~~

A. M. Horton, Justice

DYLAN BOYD, ESQ SHEILAH MCLAUGHLIN, ESQ LAW OFFICES OF DYLAN BOYD LAW OFFICE OF SHEILA MCLAUGHLIN 6 CITY CENTER SUITE 301 124 MAINE STREET SUITE 216 BRUNSWICK, ME 04011

PORTLAND, ME 04101

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cavanaugh v. Davis, (Me. Super. Ct. 2017).

Cavanaugh v. Davis (Cavanaugh v. Davis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

West v. Young
38 Misc. 3d 1030 (New York Supreme Court, 2013)
Chaput v. Scafidi
66 V.I. 160 (Superior Court of The Virgin Islands, 2017)