Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co.
149 A. 131, 110 Conn. 698
Opinion
We cannot hold upon the evidence under the rule announced in Rosenthal v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 88 Conn. 65, 89 Atl. 888, as amplified, explained and followed in Belledeau v. Connecticut Co., ante, p. 625, 149 Atl. 127, that the trial court erred in setting-aside the verdict.’
'There is no error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co., 149 A. 131, 110 Conn. 698 (Colo. 1930).
149 A. 131 (Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gary Railways, Inc. v. Chumcoff
96 N.E.2d 685 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1951)