Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co.

149 A. 131, 110 Conn. 698
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMarch 5, 1930
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 A. 131 (Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cavanaugh v. Connecticut Co., 149 A. 131, 110 Conn. 698 (Colo. 1930).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We cannot hold upon the evidence under the rule announced in Rosenthal v. New York, N. H. & H. R. Co., 88 Conn. 65, 89 Atl. 888, as amplified, explained and followed in Belledeau v. Connecticut Co., ante, p. 625, 149 Atl. 127, that the trial court erred in setting-aside the verdict.’

'There is no error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gary Railways, Inc. v. Chumcoff
96 N.E.2d 685 (Indiana Court of Appeals, 1951)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A. 131, 110 Conn. 698, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavanaugh-v-connecticut-co-conn-1930.