Cavanaugh v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cavanaugh v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.

17 A.D.2d 628, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8654

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 2, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 628 (Cavanaugh v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cavanaugh v. Brooklyn Union Gas Co., 17 A.D.2d 628, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8654 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of a gas explosion in a gas range, defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 17, 1961 after trial, upon the jury’s verdict, as is in favor of plaintiff Sarah Cavanaugh and against it. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the facts, action severed as against all the defendants other than the Gas Company, and a new trial granted as between the plaintiff Sarah Cavanaugh and the defendant Gas Company, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the verdict against the Gas Company was contrary to the weight of the credible evidence. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries arising out of a gas explosion in a gas range, defendant Brooklyn Union Gas Company appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, entered October 17, 1961 after trial, upon the jury’s verdict, as is in favor of plaintiff Sarah Cavanaugh and against it. Judgment, insofar as appealed from, reversed on the facts, action severed as against all the defendants other than the Gas Company, and a new trial granted as between the plaintiff Sarah Cavanaugh and the defendant Gas Company, with costs to abide the event. In our opinion, the verdict against the Gas Company was contrary to the weight of the credible evidence. Ughetta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 628, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8654, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavanaugh-v-brooklyn-union-gas-co-nyappdiv-1962.