Cavanagh v. People of California
This text of 300 F. App'x 456 (Cavanagh v. People of California) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Peter J. Cavanagh and Theresea E. Cavanagh appeal pro se from the decision of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (“BAP”) affirming the bankruptcy court’s order remanding to state court a criminal proceeding in which the Cavanaghs are defendants. We dismiss.
[457]*457We lack jurisdiction to review the BAP’s decision affirming the bankruptcy court’s remand order. See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(d), 1452(b); see also Things Remembered, Inc. v. Petrarca, 516 U.S. 124, 127-29, 116 S.Ct. 494,133 L.Ed.2d 461 (1995) (concluding that 28 U.S.C. §§ 1447(d) and 1452(b) bars appellate review of remand orders).
Appellants’ request for judicial notice is denied as moot.
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
300 F. App'x 456, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavanagh-v-people-of-california-ca9-2008.