Cavanagh v. Dooley

88 Mass. 66
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 15, 1863
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 88 Mass. 66 (Cavanagh v. Dooley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cavanagh v. Dooley, 88 Mass. 66 (Mass. 1863).

Opinion

Dewey, J.

The facts relied upon in defence growing out of the stipulation of the parties to refer any matter of disagreement as to the performance of the contract between them to disinterested persons, to be selected by the parties, and the proceedings under such agreement in the selection of two arbitrators and the submission to them, do not constitute a legal defence to this action.

Independently of the objection that such agreement to refer any matter in dispute arising upon a contract does not oust the courts of law of jurisdiction, the case shows only an attempt to refer, and a failure to obtain any award by the two arbitrators.

In this view of the case, we see no ground, for exception to the ruling.

Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

First Ecclesiastical Society v. Besse
119 A. 903 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1923)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
88 Mass. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavanagh-v-dooley-mass-1863.