Cavan v. Martin

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Cavan v. Martin

3 Va. 228

DecidedMay 14, 1802

StatusPublished

This text of 3 Va. 228 (Cavan v. Martin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cavan v. Martin, 3 Va. 228 (Va. Ct. App. 1802).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CUR.

“The Court is of opinion, that the evidence of John M’Knight, given in his deposition, being the only evidence in this cause, was not sufficient to charge the appellants with the wages of the appel-lee, from the port of Rotterdam to the time of the capture of the vessel, in the said deposition mentioned or, with any part of the said wages; and that the judgments of the District Court, and of the Court of Hustings, are erroneous. Therefore, it is considered, that they be reversed, &c. ”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CUR.

“The Court is of opinion, that the evidence of John M’Knight, given in his deposition, being the only evidence in this cause, was not sufficient to charge the appellants with the wages of the appel-lee, from the port of Rotterdam to the time of the capture of the vessel, in the said deposition mentioned or, with any part of the said wages; and that the judgments of the District Court, and of the Court of Hustings, are erroneous. Therefore, it is considered, that they be reversed, &c. ”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 Va. 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavan-v-martin-vactapp-1802.