Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co.

217 A.2d 140, 90 N.J. Super. 243, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 391
CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
DecidedFebruary 1, 1966
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 217 A.2d 140 (Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cavalcante v. Lockheed Electronics Co., 217 A.2d 140, 90 N.J. Super. 243, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 391 (N.J. Ct. App. 1966).

Opinion

90 N.J. Super. 243 (1966)
217 A.2d 140

ANGELA ANN CAVALCANTE, PETITIONER-RESPONDENT,
v.
LOCKHEED ELECTRONICS COMPANY, RESPONDENT-APPELLANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued January 24, 1966.
Decided February 1, 1966.

Before Judges GOLDMANN, FOLEY and COLLESTER.

Mr. Gerald W. Conway argued the cause for appellant (Messrs. Schreiber, Lancaster & Demos, attorneys; Mr. John C. Demos, of counsel).

Mr. Thomas E. O'Gorman argued the cause for respondent.

PER CURIAM.

Respondent appeals from an award of compensation entered in the County Court reported at 85 N.J. Super. 230 (1964), affirming a similar award in the Workmen's Compensation Division.

Paraphrasing the conclusion of the trial court, we are of the opinion that it was reasonable for this employee, sent to a distant place by his employer for an indeterminate number of days to perform emergent duties with the greatest possible dispatch, to seek some physical relaxation during the period of his intensive work; that his activities in this regard were of themselves not unreasonable; and therefore that the accident in which he was involved, resulting in his death, arose out of and in the course of his employment.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garver v. Eastern Airlines
553 So. 2d 263 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1989)
Cremen v. Harrah's Marina Hotel Casino
680 F. Supp. 150 (D. New Jersey, 1988)
Ohio Cas. Group v. Aetna Cas. & Sur. Co.
517 A.2d 166 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1986)
Voight v. Rettinger Transportation, Inc.
306 N.W.2d 133 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1981)
Sauerwein v. Department of Industry & Human Relations
262 N.W.2d 126 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1978)
Yorkin v. Volvo Distributing Co.
363 A.2d 908 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1976)
Salierno v. Micro Stamping Co.
345 A.2d 342 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)
Daniello v. MacHise Express Co.
289 A.2d 558 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1972)
Silagy v. STATE OF NJ AND COUNTY OF MERCER
244 A.2d 542 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
217 A.2d 140, 90 N.J. Super. 243, 1966 N.J. Super. LEXIS 391, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavalcante-v-lockheed-electronics-co-njsuperctappdiv-1966.