Cavaco v. State
This text of 765 So. 2d 985 (Cavaco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, except that the written judgment and sentence is corrected to read that appellant is committed to the custody of the Department of Corrections for a term of four years to be followed by two years probation in conformance with the trial court’s oral pronouncements. Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). The state’s argument regarding appellant’s ability to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is premature and not ripe for consideration. Strange v. State, 764 So.2d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
765 So. 2d 985, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11470, 2000 WL 1268811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavaco-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.