Cavaco v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cavaco v. State

765 So. 2d 985, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11470, 2000 WL 1268811

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 8, 2000·No. No. 1D99-242·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, except that the written judgment and sentence is corrected to read that appellant is committed to the custody of the Department of Corrections for a term of four years to be followed by two years probation in conformance with the trial court’s oral pronouncements. Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). The state’s argument regarding appellant’s ability to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is premature and not ripe for consideration. Strange v. State, 764 So.2d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

JOANOS, LAWRENCE AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, except that the written judgment and sentence is corrected to read that appellant is committed to the custody of the Department of Corrections for a term of four years to be followed by two years probation in conformance with the trial court’s oral pronouncements. Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). The state’s argument regarding appellant’s ability to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is premature and not ripe for consideration. Strange v. State, 764 So.2d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

JOANOS, LAWRENCE AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Cavaco v. State, 765 So. 2d 985, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11470, 2000 WL 1268811 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

765 So. 2d 985 (Cavaco v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related