Cavaco v. State

765 So. 2d 985, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11470, 2000 WL 1268811
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedSeptember 8, 2000
DocketNo. 1D99-242
StatusPublished

This text of 765 So. 2d 985 (Cavaco v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cavaco v. State, 765 So. 2d 985, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11470, 2000 WL 1268811 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm appellant’s judgment and sentence, except that the written judgment and sentence is corrected to read that appellant is committed to the custody of the Department of Corrections for a term of four years to be followed by two years probation in conformance with the trial court’s oral pronouncements. Maddox v. State, 760 So.2d 89 (Fla.2000). The state’s argument regarding appellant’s ability to raise a claim of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is premature and not ripe for consideration. Strange v. State, 764 So.2d 919 (Fla. 1st DCA 2000).

JOANOS, LAWRENCE AND VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Strange v. State
764 So. 2d 919 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)
Maddox v. State
760 So. 2d 89 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
765 So. 2d 985, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 11470, 2000 WL 1268811, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cavaco-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.