Cava v. Cava
200 So. 2d 583, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4519
Opinion
This interlocutory appeal is from an or-er denying defendant’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings. It appearing that the complaint stated a cause of action, and the defendant had no benefit of any admissions of the facts alleged in his answer, the motion was properly denied. See Paradise Pools, Inc. v. Genauer, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 860.
We express no opinion upon the validity of the grounds given by the circuit judge for the order denying the motion.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cava v. Cava, 200 So. 2d 583, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4519 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).
200 So. 2d 583 (Cava v. Cava) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Paradise Pools v. Genauer
104 So. 2d 860 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1958)