Cava v. Cava

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Cava v. Cava

200 So. 2d 583, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4519

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 27, 1967

DocketNo. 67-266

StatusPublished

This text of 200 So. 2d 583 (Cava v. Cava) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cava v. Cava, 200 So. 2d 583, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4519 (Fla. Ct. App. 1967).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is from an or-er denying defendant’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings. It appearing that the complaint stated a cause of action, and the defendant had no benefit of any admissions of the facts alleged in his answer, the motion was properly denied. See Paradise Pools, Inc. v. Genauer, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 860.

We express no opinion upon the validity of the grounds given by the circuit judge for the order denying the motion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This interlocutory appeal is from an or-er denying defendant’s motion for a judgment on the pleadings. It appearing that the complaint stated a cause of action, and the defendant had no benefit of any admissions of the facts alleged in his answer, the motion was properly denied. See Paradise Pools, Inc. v. Genauer, Fla.App.1958, 104 So.2d 860.

We express no opinion upon the validity of the grounds given by the circuit judge for the order denying the motion.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

200 So. 2d 583, 1967 Fla. App. LEXIS 4519, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cava-v-cava-fladistctapp-1967.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack