Cauthorn v. Harkness
This text of 60 Ga. 299 (Cauthorn v. Harkness) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This was a motion made in the court below to set aside a judgment obtained in the county court of Butts county, in September, 1866, on various grounds. On the trial of the case (an issue having been formed as to the facts), the jury, under the charge of the court, found a verdict against the motion. The case was brought here on a bill of exceptions to the charge of the court.
It appears from the evidence in the record, that more than seven years had elapsed from the time of the rendition of the judgment to the time when the motion was made to set it aside. The court charged the jury, amongst other things, that if they found from the evidence, that the judgment had been entered up more than seven years, then the statute would bar the motion to set it aside, and they should find against the motion. There was no error in this charge of the court in view of the evidence in the record. Jones vs. Killebrew, 55th Georgia Reports, 158. The verdict was right under the evidence and the law applicable thereto as to the motion to set aside the judgment, it being barred; therefore let the judgment of the court below be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
60 Ga. 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cauthorn-v-harkness-ga-1878.