Cauthen Lewis v. City of Los Angeles

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedDecember 14, 2022
Docket2:21-cv-10014
StatusUnknown

This text of Cauthen Lewis v. City of Los Angeles (Cauthen Lewis v. City of Los Angeles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cauthen Lewis v. City of Los Angeles, (C.D. Cal. 2022).

Opinion

Case 2:21-cv-10014-DMG-MAA Document 45 Filed 12/14/22 Page 1 of 14 Page ID #:199

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11 CAUTHEN LEWIS, CASE NO. CV21-10014-DMG-MAAx

12 Hon. Dolly M. Gee – Ctrm. 8C, 8th Fl. (First St.) Hon. Mag. Maria A. Audero – Ctrm. 690, 6th Fl. 13

Plaintiff, (Roybal) v. [PROPOSED] PROTECTIVE ORDER 14

15 CITY OF LOS ANGELES, et al.,

17 Defendants. 18

19 20 1. PURPOSES AND LIMITATIONS 21 Discovery in this action is likely to involve production of confidential, proprietary, 22 or private information for which special protection from public disclosure and from use 23 for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation may be warranted. Accordingly, the 24 parties hereby stipulate to and petition the Court to enter the following Stipulated 25 Protective Order. The parties acknowledge that this Order does not confer blanket 26 protections on all disclosures or responses to discovery and that the protection it affords 27 from public disclosure and use extends only to the limited information or items that are 28 entitled to confidential treatment under the applicable legal principles. The parties further

1 Case 2:21-cv-10014-DMG-MAA Document 45 Filed 12/14/22 Page 2 of 14 Page ID #:200

1 acknowledge, as set forth in Section 12.3, below, that this Stipulated Protective Order does 2 not entitle them to file confidential information under seal; Civil Local Rule 79-5 sets forth 3 the procedures that must be followed and the standards that will be applied when a party 4 seeks permission from the court to file material under seal. 5 6 2. GOOD CAUSE STATEMENT 7 This action is likely to involve confidential information. Plaintiff is seeking 8 information that Defendant City of Los Angeles maintains as confidential, such as 9 personnel files of the police officers involved in this incident, internal affairs materials 10 and information, and other administrative material currently in the possession of the City. 11 Plaintiff is also seeking official information contained in the personnel files of the 12 involved police officers, which the City maintains as strictly confidential. The City 13 believes these documents need special protection from public disclosure and from use 14 for any purpose other than prosecuting this litigation. These materials have not been 15 publically released. 16 The City asserts that the confidentiality of the materials and information sought 17 by Plaintiff is recognized by California and federal law, as evidenced by Cal. Pen. Code 18 Sec. 832.7 and Kerr v. United States Dist. Ct. for N.D. Cal., 511 F.2d 192, 198 (9th Cir. 19 1975), aff’d 426 U.S. 394 (1976). Unfettered disclosure of the confidential information 20 contained in these files, absent a protective order, would allow the media to share this 21 information with potential jurors in the area, impacting the rights of the City to receive a 22 fair trial. 23 Accordingly, to expedite the flow of information, to facilitate the prompt 24 resolution of disputes over confidentiality of discovery materials, to adequately protect 25 information the parties are entitled to keep confidential, to ensure that the parties are 26 permitted reasonable necessary uses of such material in preparation for and in the conduct 27 of trial, to address their handling at the end of the litigation, and serve the ends of justice, 28 a protective order for such information is justified in this matter. It is the intent of the

2 Case 2:21-cv-10014-DMG-MAA Document 45 Filed 12/14/22 Page 3 of 14 Page ID #:201

1 parties that information will not be designated as confidential for tactical reasons and that 2 nothing be so designated without a good faith belief that it has been maintained in a 3 confidential, non-public manner, and there is good cause why it should not be part of the 4 public record of this case 5 6 3. DEFINITIONS 7 3.1 Action: this pending federal lawsuit. 8 3.2 Challenging Party: A Party or Nonparty that challenges the designation of 9 information or items under this Stipulated Protective Order. 10 3.3 “CONFIDENTIAL” Information or Items: information (regardless of how 11 it is generated, stored or maintained) or tangible things that qualify for protection under 12 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(c), and as specified above in the Good Cause 13 Statement. 14 3.4 Counsel: Outside Counsel of Record and In-House Counsel (as well as their 15 support staff). 16 3.5 Designating Party: Party or Nonparty that designates information or items 17 that it produces in disclosures or in responses to discovery as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 18 3.6 Disclosure or Discovery Material: All items or information, regardless of 19 the medium or manner in which it is generated, stored, or maintained (including, among 20 other things, testimony, transcripts, and tangible things), that is produced or generated in 21 disclosures or responses to discovery in this matter. 22 3.7 Expert: a person with specialized knowledge or experience in a matter 23 pertinent to the litigation who has been retained by a Party or its counsel to serve as an 24 expert witness or as a consultant in this Action. 25 3.8 In-House Counsel: attorneys who are employees of a party to this Action. 26 House Counsel does not include Outside Counsel of Record or any other outside counsel. 27 3.9 Nonparty: any natural person, partnership, corporation, association, or other 28 legal entity not named as a Party to this action.

3 Case 2:21-cv-10014-DMG-MAA Document 45 Filed 12/14/22 Page 4 of 14 Page ID #:202

1 3.10 Outside Counsel of Record: Attorneys who are not employees of a party 2 to this Action but are retained to represent or advise a party to this Action and have 3 appeared in this Action on behalf of that party or are affiliated with a law firm which has 4 appeared on behalf of that party, and includes support staff. 5 3.11 Party: Any party to this Action, including all of its officers, directors, 6 employees, consultants, retained experts, In-House Counsel, and Outside Counsel of 7 Record (and their support staffs). 8 3.12 Producing Party: A Party or Nonparty that produces Disclosure or 9 Discovery Material in this Action. 10 3.13 Professional Vendors: Persons or entities that provide litigation support 11 services (e.g., photocopying, videotaping, translating, preparing exhibits or 12 demonstrations, and organizing, storing, or retrieving data in any form or medium) and 13 their employees and subcontractors. 14 3.14 Protected Material: Any Disclosure or Discovery Material that is 15 designated as “CONFIDENTIAL.” 16 3.15 Receiving Party: A Party that receives Disclosure or Discovery Material 17 from a Producing Party. 18 4. SCOPE 19 The protections conferred by this Stipulation and Order cover not only 20 Protected Material, but also (1) any information copied or extracted from Protected 21 Material; (2) all copies, excerpts, summaries, or compilations of Protected Material; and 22 (3) any testimony, conversations, or presentations by Parties or their Counsel that might 23 reveal Protected Material. 24 Any use of Protected Material at trial shall be governed by the orders of the trial 25 judge. This Stipulated Protective Order does not govern the use of Protected Material at 26 trial. 27 / / / 28 / / /

4 Case 2:21-cv-10014-DMG-MAA Document 45 Filed 12/14/22 Page 5 of 14 Page ID #:203

1 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Cauthen Lewis v. City of Los Angeles, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cauthen-lewis-v-city-of-los-angeles-cacd-2022.