Causey v. State

504 So. 2d 34, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 740
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMarch 11, 1987
DocketBN-333
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 504 So. 2d 34 (Causey v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Causey v. State, 504 So. 2d 34, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 740 (Fla. Ct. App. 1987).

Opinion

504 So.2d 34 (1987)

Jerry Lee CAUSEY, Jr., Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. BN-333.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District.

March 11, 1987.

*35 David A. Davis, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Gregory G. Costas, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Causey appeals his judgment and sentence for the offense of attempted sexual battery upon a child 11 years or younger. The assistant public defender filed a brief pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967) stating that no good faith argument could be made that reversible error occured. Our review of the record, however, has revealed an issue which must be addressed. Pursuant to his plea of nolo contendere Causey was sentenced to seven years incarceration to be followed by five years probation. In a separate order filed as part of the sentence Causey was directed to undertake a period of community service in lieu of payment of certain court costs. The order added that Causey's failure to perform the community service within the first six months of his release from incarceration "shall result in the revocation of defendant's gain-time and completion of the balance of the original sentence."

The circuit court has no authority to direct such a summary revocation of gain-time as part of its sentence. Valdes v. State, 469 So.2d 868 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985); Bretti v. Wainwright, 360 So.2d 1299 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982); Depson v. State, 363 So.2d 43 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978). Such power is the exclusive province of the Department of Corrections, and even its power ceases upon the prisoner's release from incarceration. §§ 944.275, .28 and .291, Fla. Stat. Therefore, the order is modified to delete the sentence referring to a possible revocation of gain-time. As modified, the judgment and sentence are AFFIRMED.

BOOTH, C.J., and MILLS and THOMPSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Corley v. State
586 So. 2d 432 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Green v. State
539 So. 2d 484 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Calhoun v. State
522 So. 2d 509 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
Shupe v. State
516 So. 2d 73 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1987)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
504 So. 2d 34, 12 Fla. L. Weekly 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/causey-v-state-fladistctapp-1987.