Causey v. Randall

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-2339

KATHRYN FLOYD CAUSEY,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

COLEMAN RANDALL, Human Resources Manager; CITY OF MYRTLE BEACH SC,

Defendants - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Thomas E. Rogers, III, Magistrate Judge. (CA-03-1068)

Submitted: March 10, 2005 Decided: May 12, 2005

Before LUTTIG, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Kathryn Floyd Causey, Appellant Pro Se. Vance J. Bettis, Reyburn Williams Lominack, III, GIGNILLIAT, SAVITZ & BETTIS, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

Kathryn Floyd Causey appeals the magistrate judge’s order

denying relief without prejudice in her civil action. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we

affirm for the reasons stated by the magistrate judge.* See

Causey v. Randall, No. CA-03-1068 (D.S.C. Sept. 30, 2004).

Causey’s motion for preparation of a transcript at government

expense is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

* The parties consented to proceed before the magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) (2000).

- 2 -