Caunt v. United Shoe Machinery Co.

Fifth Circuit

Caunt v. United Shoe Machinery Co.

132 F. 976, 66 C.C.A. 46, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4365

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedOctober 28, 1904

DocketNo. 557

StatusPublished

This text of 132 F. 976 (Caunt v. United Shoe Machinery Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caunt v. United Shoe Machinery Co., 132 F. 976, 66 C.C.A. 46, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4365 (5th Cir. 1904).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a preliminary injunction. The general facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the learned judge who heard the case below. The record, as is common with motions for preliminary injunctions, consists merely of patents and other exhibits, and affidavits of witnesses who have not been subjected to cross-examination. Without prejudicing the case as it may come before us on final hearing, we are of opinion that, on this record, the appellant has raised no reasonable doubt against the conclusions of the Circuit Court. We must decline, therefore, upon the present hearing, to disturb the order of the court below.

The decretal order entered by the Circuit Court on July Í3, 1904, is affirmed, and the appellee recovers its costs of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is an appeal from a preliminary injunction. The general facts are sufficiently stated in the opinion of the learned judge who heard the case below. The record, as is common with motions for preliminary injunctions, consists merely of patents and other exhibits, and affidavits of witnesses who have not been subjected to cross-examination. Without prejudicing the case as it may come before us on final hearing, we are of opinion that, on this record, the appellant has raised no reasonable doubt against the conclusions of the Circuit Court. We must decline, therefore, upon the present hearing, to disturb the order of the court below.

The decretal order entered by the Circuit Court on July Í3, 1904, is affirmed, and the appellee recovers its costs of appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 F. 976, 66 C.C.A. 46, 1904 U.S. App. LEXIS 4365, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caunt-v-united-shoe-machinery-co-ca5-1904.