Caulfield v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.
269 A.D. 671, 54 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3189
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Caulfield v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.. Read the opinion of the Court — 268 A.D. 661 →
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 26, 1945·Published
Opinion
Motion for reargument denied, without costs. Motion for leave to appeal to the Court of Appeals granted. The following question is certified: Are the additional defenses set forth in the proposed amended answer sufficient as a matter of law? Present — Close, P. J., Carswell, Johnston, Adel and Lewis, JJ. [See 268 App. Div. 661,]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caulfield v. Elmhurst Contracting Co., 269 A.D. 671, 54 N.Y.S.2d 216, 1945 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3189 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1945).
269 A.D. 671 (Caulfield v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Caulfield v. Elmhurst Contracting Co.
268 A.D. 661 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1945)