Cauley v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Cauley v. State

147 S.E. 808, 39 Ga. App. 541, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 409

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedApril 9, 1929

Docket19483, 19484, 19485

StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E. 808 (Cauley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cauley v. State, 147 S.E. 808, 39 Ga. App. 541, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 409 (Ga. Ct. App. 1929).

Pincite

Opinion

Luke, J.

Accusations in two of these cases charge that the de-. fendant “did place and cause to be placed in the waters of Ogeechee river a certain trap, basket, and similar device for the purpose of catching fish.” The accusation in the third ease charges that the defendant, on June 24, 1928, “did fish and attempt to catch fish with hook and line, nets, gigs, and by other manner and means, in the waters and streams within the State of Georgia, said date being on Sabbath day.” In each case the defendant was convicted. He made motions for a new trial, which were overruled, and in each case he assigns error in his bill of exceptions upon that ruling. Each motion was upon the general grounds only. In each case the evidence authorized the verdict, and the judge properly overruled the motion.

Judgments affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Luke, J.

Accusations in two of these cases charge that the de-. fendant “did place and cause to be placed in the waters of Ogeechee river a certain trap, basket, and similar device for the purpose of catching fish.” The accusation in the third ease charges that the defendant, on June 24, 1928, “did fish and attempt to catch fish with hook and line, nets, gigs, and by other manner and means, in the waters and streams within the State of Georgia, said date being on Sabbath day.” In each case the defendant was convicted. He made motions for a new trial, which were overruled, and in each case he assigns error in his bill of exceptions upon that ruling. Each motion was upon the general grounds only. In each case the evidence authorized the verdict, and the judge properly overruled the motion.

Judgments affirmed.

Broyles, C. J., and Bloodworth, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

147 S.E. 808, 39 Ga. App. 541, 1929 Ga. App. LEXIS 409, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cauley-v-state-gactapp-1929.