Cauldwell v. Russi

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cauldwell v. Russi

216 A.D.2d 626, 627 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5859

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 1, 1995

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 216 A.D.2d 626 (Cauldwell v. Russi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cauldwell v. Russi, 216 A.D.2d 626, 627 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5859 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered March 22, 1994 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the State Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole.

Petitioner has reappeared before the State Board of Parole since the parole release hearing giving rise to this appeal and his request for release on parole has again been denied. Consequently, the instant appeal is now moot and must be dismissed. Nevertheless, were we to consider the merits, we would find that the determination denying petitioner release on parole at the prior hearing is not arbitrary or capricious and is supported by substantial evidence in the record.

[627]*627Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Teresi, J.), entered March 22, 1994 in Albany County, which dismissed petitioner’s application, in a proceeding pursuant CPLR article 78, to review a determination of the State Board of Parole denying petitioner’s request for parole.

Petitioner has reappeared before the State Board of Parole since the parole release hearing giving rise to this appeal and his request for release on parole has again been denied. Consequently, the instant appeal is now moot and must be dismissed. Nevertheless, were we to consider the merits, we would find that the determination denying petitioner release on parole at the prior hearing is not arbitrary or capricious and is supported by substantial evidence in the record.

[627]*627Mikoll, J. P., Mercure, Crew III, Casey and Yesawich Jr., JJ., concur. Ordered that the appeal is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

216 A.D.2d 626, 627 N.Y.S.2d 578, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5859, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cauldwell-v-russi-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack