Caul v. District of Columbia
164 A.2d 350, 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 294
Opinion
Appellants were convicted of committing a lewd, obscene or indecent act. Code 1951, § 22-1112(a) (Supp. VIII).
A review of the record demonstrates that the evidence is not sufficient to sustain the convictions.
Court-appointed counsel is commended for the able service he rendered in these cases.
Reversed with instructions to enter judgments of acquittal. Mandate to issue forthwith.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caul v. District of Columbia, 164 A.2d 350, 1960 D.C. App. LEXIS 294 (D.C. 1960).
164 A.2d 350 (Caul v. District of Columbia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.