Caufield v. Musella

84 A.D.2d 556, 443 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15629

Opinion

In a personal injury action, plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County [557]*557(Murphy, J.), dated April 27, 1981, which denied her motion to reinstate a prior order of the same court, dated September 30,1980, which had (1) directed a severance of the action as against defendant Tri-County Sewer & Drain Company, Inc., and (2) set the matter down for an inquest against that defendant based upon its defaults in appearing and answering. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements, motion granted, order of September 30, 1980 reinstated, and matter remitted to Special Term for an assessment of damages as against the defendant Tri-County Sewer & Drain Company, Inc. Since the repeated defaults of defendant Tri-County Sewer & Drain Company, Inc., in appearing and answering were occasioned solely by law office failure, Special Term erred, as a matter of law, in failing to reinstate the order of September 30,1980, which severed plaintiff’s action against that defendant and directed an inquest (see Barasch v Micucci, 49 NY2d 594; Bruno v Village of Port Chester, 77 AD2d 580, vacating on rearg 74 AD2d 629). Damiani, J.P., Gulotta, Margett and Bracken, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Caufield v. Musella, 84 A.D.2d 556, 443 N.Y.S.2d 276, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 15629 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

84 A.D.2d 556 (Caufield v. Musella) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barasch v. Micucci
404 N.E.2d 1275 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)
Bruno v. Village of Port Chester
74 A.D.2d 629 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)
Bruno v. Village of Port Chester
77 A.D.2d 580 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1980)