Caudle v. State
123 S.W. 413, 57 Tex. Crim. 363, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 462
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of aggravated assault, and his punishment assessed at a fine of $25.
Appellant attempted to defend against the prosecution on the ground that he had been prosecuted for simple assault in the mayor’s court. This would not be a defense, and the court did not err in finding appellant guilty under the evidence in this case of aggravated assault.
The judgment is affirmed.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caudle v. State, 123 S.W. 413, 57 Tex. Crim. 363, 1909 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 462 (Tex. 1909).
123 S.W. 413 (Caudle v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mangan v. State
344 S.W.2d 448 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1961)
State v. Smith
253 N.W. 130 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1934)