Caudle v. State
This text of Caudle v. State (Caudle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Delaware primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE
DERRICK CAUDLE, § § Defendant Below, § No. 266, 2025 Appellant, § § Court Below—Superior Court v. § of the State of Delaware § STATE OF DELAWARE, § Cr. ID No. 1802012108 (N) § Appellee. §
Submitted: October 20, 2025 Decided: December 15, 2025
Before SEITZ, Chief Justice; VALIHURA and GRIFFITHS, Justices.
ORDER
After careful consideration of the opening brief, motion to affirm, and the
record on appeal, the Court concludes that the judgment below should be affirmed
on the basis of the Superior Court’s May 20, 2025 order denying the appellant’s
motion for correction of illegal sentence.1
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS ORDERED that the motion to affirm is
GRANTED, and the judgment of the Superior Court is AFFIRMED.
BY THE COURT:
/s/ Collins J. Seitz, Jr. Chief Justice
1 State v. Caudle, 2025 WL 1446443 (Del. Super. Ct. May 20, 2025).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Caudle v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caudle-v-state-del-2025.