Caudle v. Leath

175 So. 919, 234 Ala. 695
CourtSupreme Court of Alabama
DecidedJune 3, 1937
Docket7 Div. 440.
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 175 So. 919 (Caudle v. Leath) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Caudle v. Leath, 175 So. 919, 234 Ala. 695 (Ala. 1937).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed on authority of Caudle v. Cotton, ante, p. 126, 173 So. 847, and Kennedy v. Shamblin, ante, p. 230, 174 So. 773.

ANDERSON, C. J., and GARDNER, BOULDIN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McGee v. Leath
176 So. 917 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)
Daniels v. Daniels
175 So. 919 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
175 So. 919, 234 Ala. 695, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caudle-v-leath-ala-1937.