Caudle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
This text of Caudle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (Caudle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-1099
EARLY A. CAUDLE,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States Tax Court. (Tax Ct. No. 08-12727)
Submitted: July 23, 2009 Decided: July 27, 2009
Before WILKINSON and AGEE, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Early A. Caudle, Petitioner Pro Se. Bruce R. Ellisen, Curtis Clarence Pett, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Tax Division, Washington, D.C., for Respondent.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Early A. Caudle appeals the tax court’s order
dismissing his petition for lack of jurisdiction. We have
reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,
we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Caudle v.
Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 08-12727 (U.S. Tax Ct. Nov. 14,
2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials
before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Caudle v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caudle-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca4-2009.