Caudle v. Commissioner

Fourth Circuit

Caudle v. Commissioner

603 F. App'x 220

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 21, 2015·No. No. 15-1003·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dora Caudle appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s proposed levy action with respect to her 2005 and 2006 income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Caudle v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 18735-13L (U.S.T.C. Oct. 2, [221]*2212014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Dora Caudle appeals from the tax court’s order upholding the Commissioner of Internal Revenue’s proposed levy action with respect to her 2005 and 2006 income tax liability. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the tax court. Caudle v. Comm’r of Internal Revenue, No. 18735-13L (U.S.T.C. Oct. 2, [221]*2212014). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Caudle v. Commissioner, 603 F. App'x 220 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

603 F. App'x 220 (Caudle v. Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related