Caudle v. Caudle

Supreme Court of Georgia

Caudle v. Caudle

181 S.E. 669, 181 Ga. 144, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 45

CourtSupreme Court of Georgia

DecidedAugust 7, 1935

DocketNo. 10592

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 181 S.E. 669 (Caudle v. Caudle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caudle v. Caudle, 181 S.E. 669, 181 Ga. 144, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 45 (Ga. 1935).

Pincite

Opinions

Hutcheson, Justice.

Mrs. Lucy Garwood Caudle, former wife of George E. Caudle, filed suit against Mrs. Katie Caudle (the widow of George E. Caudle), individually and as executrix of his estate. The plaintiff alleged that she with George E. Caudle, before his marriage to the. defendant, entered into a contract providing for payment of $25 per month to plaintiff as long as she should live and remain unmarried; and that this contract was made in lieu of any alimony verdict or decree. She prayed that the court determine the amount and fix the priority of her claim, that the defendant be required to file an inventory of the estate; and for other relief. The defendant filed a demurrer on several grounds, the main one being that the first alimony judgment was rendered before the appearance term of court, and was of no effect. The court overruled the demurrer.

We hold that the case is one arising by virtue of the contract, and is entirely unaffected by the litigation; and regardless of the validity of the alimony decree, and although the plaintiff may not be entitled to recover the present value of the contract based upon expectancy, it sufficiently appears from her allegations that she would be entitled to recover at least the monthly installments which had not been paid at the time the suit was filed. The petition therefore stated a cause of action for at least a part of the relief sought, and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Hutcheson, Justice.

Mrs. Lucy Garwood Caudle, former wife of George E. Caudle, filed suit against Mrs. Katie Caudle (the widow of George E. Caudle), individually and as executrix of his estate. The plaintiff alleged that she with George E. Caudle, before his marriage to the. defendant, entered into a contract providing for payment of $25 per month to plaintiff as long as she should live and remain unmarried; and that this contract was made in lieu of any alimony verdict or decree. She prayed that the court determine the amount and fix the priority of her claim, that the defendant be required to file an inventory of the estate; and for other relief. The defendant filed a demurrer on several grounds, the main one being that the first alimony judgment was rendered before the appearance term of court, and was of no effect. The court overruled the demurrer.

We hold that the case is one arising by virtue of the contract, and is entirely unaffected by the litigation; and regardless of the validity of the alimony decree, and although the plaintiff may not be entitled to recover the present value of the contract based upon expectancy, it sufficiently appears from her allegations that she would be entitled to recover at least the monthly installments which had not been paid at the time the suit was filed. The petition therefore stated a cause of action for at least a part of the relief sought, and the court did not err in overruling the demurrer.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concur, except

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

181 S.E. 669, 181 Ga. 144, 1935 Ga. LEXIS 45, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caudle-v-caudle-ga-1935.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack