Caudill v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Caudill v. State

1914 OK CR 78, 140 P. 1194, 10 Okla. Crim. 683, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 198

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 21, 1914

DocketNo. A-1993.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 78 (Caudill v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Caudill v. State, 1914 OK CR 78, 140 P. 1194, 10 Okla. Crim. 683, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 198 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Oscar Caudill, was convicted on December 7, 1912, in the district court of Beckham county on a charge of assault and battery, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. Upon a careful examination of the record we feel that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The plaintiff in error, Oscar Caudill, was convicted on December 7, 1912, in the district court of Beckham county on a charge of assault and battery, and his punishment fixed at a fine of $100 and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. Upon a careful examination of the record we feel that the judgment of the trial court should be affirmed, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 78, 140 P. 1194, 10 Okla. Crim. 683, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caudill-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.