Caudill v. Dellinger
511 S.E.2d 304, 350 N.C. 89, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 50
Opinion
On defendant Dellinger’s appeal, the decision of the Court of Appeals is affirmed for the reasons stated in the majority opinion by Judge Horton. Defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
AFFIRMED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Caudill v. Dellinger, 511 S.E.2d 304, 350 N.C. 89, 1999 N.C. LEXIS 50 (N.C. 1999).
511 S.E.2d 304 (Caudill v. Dellinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Yan-Min Wang v. Unc-Ch School of Medicine
716 S.E.2d 646 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2011)
Covington v. N.C. of Correction
North Carolina Industrial Commission, 2007
Hodge v. North Carolina Department of Transportation
622 S.E.2d 702 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
Newberne v. Department of Crime Control & Public Safety
359 N.C. 782 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2005)
Newberne v. DEPT. OF CRIME CONTROL
618 S.E.2d 201 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2005)
Swain v. Elfland
550 S.E.2d 530 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2001)
Deerman v. Beverly California Corp.
518 S.E.2d 804 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Cox v. Indian Head Industries, Inc.
187 F.R.D. 531 (W.D. North Carolina, 1999)