Caudell v. Southern Railway Co.
This text of 58 S.E. 689 (Caudell v. Southern Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Tlie plaintiff having failed to prove his ease as laid, the court should have awarded a nonsuit. The defendant having introduced no testimony, the direction of a verdict in its favor was erroneous. Proctor & Gamble Co. v. Blakely Oil Co., 128 Ga. 606, 57 S. E. 879.
The judgment is reversed, with direction 'that in the trial court a judgment of nonsuit be substituted for the judgment rendered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
58 S.E. 689, 2 Ga. App. 479, 1907 Ga. App. LEXIS 431, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/caudell-v-southern-railway-co-gactapp-1907.