Catterson v. Long Island Rail Road

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Catterson v. Long Island Rail Road

286 A.D. 848, 143 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4334

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1955

StatusPublished

This text of 286 A.D. 848 (Catterson v. Long Island Rail Road) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Catterson v. Long Island Rail Road, 286 A.D. 848, 143 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4334 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Pincite

Opinion

In an action on behalf of the infant plaintiff Catterson to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained when an automobile, in which he was a passenger, was struck by defendant’s train, and by his parent for medical expenses and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant entered on a jury verdict. The notice of appeal states that an order denying a motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial is brought up for review. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from order dismissed, without costs. No such order is printed in the record. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. [See post, p. 877.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action on behalf of the infant plaintiff Catterson to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to have been sustained when an automobile, in which he was a passenger, was struck by defendant’s train, and by his parent for medical expenses and loss of services, plaintiffs appeal from a judgment in favor of defendant entered on a jury verdict. The notice of appeal states that an order denying a motion to set aside the verdict and for a new trial is brought up for review. Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Appeal from order dismissed, without costs. No such order is printed in the record. Present — Nolan, P. J., Wenzel, MacCrate, Murphy and Ughetta, JJ. [See post, p. 877.]

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

286 A.D. 848, 143 N.Y.S.2d 639, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catterson-v-long-island-rail-road-nyappdiv-1955.