Cattel v. Warwick

6 N.J.L. 231
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided September 15, 1822·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We are of opinion, that the judgment must be reversed. The purchasing of the equity of redemption does not cancel the bonds; therefore they ought to have been admitted as a legal set off. What equities may arise, is another question; as to these, the defendant must seek relief in a court of equity.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cattel v. Warwick, 6 N.J.L. 231 (N.J. 1822).

6 N.J.L. 231 (Cattel v. Warwick) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.