Catskill Bank v. Sanford

4 How. Pr. 100
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJune 15, 1847
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 4 How. Pr. 100 (Catskill Bank v. Sanford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catskill Bank v. Sanford, 4 How. Pr. 100 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1847).

Opinion

Willard, Justice.

The amended code took effect prior to the issuing of this scire facias, and must control the rights of the parties. By § 428 the writ of scire facias is abolished, and the remedies prescribed by the code, (§§ 283 and 284,) are substituted. The saving clause in § 428 relates only to proceedings by scire facias commenced before the code took effect, whether judgment had been rendered therein or not. The motion contemplated by § 284 renders a scire facias unnecessary, and is a more simple and less expensive remedy. I will set aside the scire facias for irregularity, but without costs and without prejudice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Clare v. Guidi
12 Misc. 2d 807 (New York Supreme Court, 1958)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
4 How. Pr. 100, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catskill-bank-v-sanford-nysupct-1847.