Catolico v. Nicholson

Federal Circuit

Catolico v. Nicholson

178 F. App'x 1

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedMarch 27, 2006

DocketNo. 06-7028

StatusPublished

This text of 178 F. App'x 1 (Catolico v. Nicholson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Catolico v. Nicholson, 178 F. App'x 1 (Fed. Cir. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

On December 16, 2005 the court issued an order allowing Lourdes T. Católico (“Católico”) 21 days to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as not timely. Católico requested an extension of time to respond or obtain counsel. An extension of time until March 2, 2006 was granted for Católico or counsel to file an entry of appearance and respond to the show cause order. Católico has failed to comply with the orders.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

On December 16, 2005 the court issued an order allowing Lourdes T. Católico (“Católico”) 21 days to show cause why this appeal should not be dismissed as not timely. Católico requested an extension of time to respond or obtain counsel. An extension of time until March 2, 2006 was granted for Católico or counsel to file an entry of appearance and respond to the show cause order. Católico has failed to comply with the orders.

Upon consideration thereof,

IT IS ORDERED THAT:

(1) This appeal is dismissed.

(2) Each side shall bear its own costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

178 F. App'x 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catolico-v-nicholson-cafc-2006.