Cato v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Cato v. State

215 S.W. 300, 85 Tex. Crim. 659

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas

DecidedOctober 15, 1919

DocketNo. 5436.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 215 S.W. 300 (Cato v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cato v. State, 215 S.W. 300, 85 Tex. Crim. 659 (Tex. 1919).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was convicted of burglary, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.

There is a statement of facts in the record accompanying the transcript, but the transcript does not contain notice of appeal. If notice of appeal was given and entered of record in the trial court the record before us does not so show. Without this notice of appeal the jurisdiction of this court would not attach.

The appeal, therefore, will be dismissed.

Dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI