Cato v. State
215 S.W. 300, 85 Tex. Crim. 659
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided October 15, 1919·No. No. 5436.·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant was convicted of burglary, his punishment being assessed at two years confinement in the penitentiary.
There is a statement of facts in the record accompanying the transcript, but the transcript does not contain notice of appeal. If notice of appeal was given and entered of record in the trial court the record before us does not so show. Without this notice of appeal the jurisdiction of this court would not attach.
The appeal, therefore, will be dismissed.
Dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cato v. State, 215 S.W. 300, 85 Tex. Crim. 659 (Tex. 1919).
215 S.W. 300 (Cato v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anzualda and Yglecias v. State
27 S.W.2d 231 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1930)