Cato v. International Longshoreman's Ass'n

Fifth Circuit

Cato v. International Longshoreman's Ass'n

485 F.2d 583, 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3014

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 6, 1973·No. No. 73-2452·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We agree with the district court that (1) the plaintiffs-appellants’ claim under the Railway Labor Act, Title 45, U.S.C. Sec. 151 is barred by the statute of limitations; and (2) that the Civil Rights Act, Title 42, U.S.C. Sec. 1981 does not support the plaintiffs-appellants’ claim against these appellees. The partial judgment¹ of the district court² is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We agree with the district court that (1) the plaintiffs-appellants’ claim under the Railway Labor Act, Title 45, U.S.C. Sec. 151 is barred by the statute of limitations; and (2) that the Civil Rights Act, Title 42, U.S.C. Sec. 1981 does not support the plaintiffs-appellants’ claim against these appellees. The partial judgment¹ of the district court² is

Affirmed.

Cato v. International Longshoreman's Ass'n, 485 F.2d 583, 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3014 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

485 F.2d 583 (Cato v. International Longshoreman's Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related