Cato v. International Longshoreman's Ass'n

Fifth Circuit

Cato v. International Longshoreman's Ass'n

485 F.2d 583, 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3014

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedNovember 6, 1973

DocketNo. 73-2452

StatusPublished

This text of 485 F.2d 583 (Cato v. International Longshoreman's Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cato v. International Longshoreman's Ass'n, 485 F.2d 583, 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3014 (5th Cir. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

We agree with the district court that (1) the plaintiffs-appellants’ claim under the Railway Labor Act, Title 45, U.S.C. Sec. 151 is barred by the statute of limitations; and (2) that the Civil Rights Act, Title 42, U.S.C. Sec. 1981 does not support the plaintiffs-appellants’ claim against these appellees. The partial judgment¹ of the district court² is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

We agree with the district court that (1) the plaintiffs-appellants’ claim under the Railway Labor Act, Title 45, U.S.C. Sec. 151 is barred by the statute of limitations; and (2) that the Civil Rights Act, Title 42, U.S.C. Sec. 1981 does not support the plaintiffs-appellants’ claim against these appellees. The partial judgment¹ of the district court² is

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

485 F.2d 583, 84 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3014, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cato-v-international-longshoremans-assn-ca5-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack