Cato v. Cato

608 A.2d 691, 222 Conn. 906, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 200
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided May 21, 1992·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 142, is granted, limited to the following question:

“Was the divided Appellate Court correct in holding in a claim for dissolution that General Statutes § 52-57a allows for in-hand service of process by a Texas sheriff on a nonresident defendant in Texas without an order of notice having been obtained as provided for in the domestic relations long-arm statute, General Statutes § 46b-46?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cato v. Cato, 608 A.2d 691, 222 Conn. 906, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 200 (Colo. 1992).

608 A.2d 691 (Cato v. Cato) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Cato v. Cato
626 A.2d 734 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1993)