Cato v. Cato

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Cato v. Cato

608 A.2d 691, 222 Conn. 906, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 200

CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut

DecidedMay 21, 1992

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 608 A.2d 691 (Cato v. Cato) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cato v. Cato, 608 A.2d 691, 222 Conn. 906, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 200 (Colo. 1992).

Pincite

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 142, is granted, limited to the following question:

“Was the divided Appellate Court correct in holding in a claim for dissolution that General Statutes § 52-57a allows for in-hand service of process by a Texas sheriff on a nonresident defendant in Texas without an order of notice having been obtained as provided for in the domestic relations long-arm statute, General Statutes § 46b-46?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 27 Conn. App. 142, is granted, limited to the following question:

“Was the divided Appellate Court correct in holding in a claim for dissolution that General Statutes § 52-57a allows for in-hand service of process by a Texas sheriff on a nonresident defendant in Texas without an order of notice having been obtained as provided for in the domestic relations long-arm statute, General Statutes § 46b-46?”

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

608 A.2d 691, 222 Conn. 906, 1992 Conn. LEXIS 200, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cato-v-cato-conn-1992.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack