Catlin v. Moynihan

230 P. 1114, 76 Colo. 164, 1924 Colo. LEXIS 496
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedJuly 7, 1924
DocketNo. 10,992.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 230 P. 1114 (Catlin v. Moynihan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Catlin v. Moynihan, 230 P. 1114, 76 Colo. 164, 1924 Colo. LEXIS 496 (Colo. 1924).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Whitford

delivered the opinion of the court.

A verdict for $50 was directed by the court against the plaintiff in error as garnishee. After the evidence was all in and both plaintiff and defendant had rested, each side requested the court to direct a verdict in his favor. We said, in Auto Co. v. Petter, 72 Colo. 570, 212 Pac. 823, that “a request by each party for a directed verdict is equivalent to a stipulation that the facts may be found by the court. The court’s finding, thereupon made, is conclusive if there is evidence to support it.” There was some conflict in the testimony, but there was abundant evidence to justify the. finding in favor of plaintiff below.

*165 We find no reversible error in the record. Supersedeas denied, judgment affirmed.

Mr. Justice Allen, sitting for Mr. Chief Justice Teller, and Mr. Justice Denison concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Parker v. Plympton
273 P. 1030 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1928)
Butts v. Sauve
245 P. 713 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1926)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
230 P. 1114, 76 Colo. 164, 1924 Colo. LEXIS 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/catlin-v-moynihan-colo-1924.